SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 6908

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
K C ZYLAJA – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER COLLECTORATE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3576 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MANAVI MURALEEDHARAN, SMT.ANJANA K.P.
For the Respondents: K.JANARDHANA SHENOY, GP

Authorities are mandated to respond to applications under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules within reasonable timeframes.

Headnote:The petitioner filed an application under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008, but did not receive a timely response. The court determined that authorities have a legal duty to act on such applications expeditiously. The court directed a report to be submitted within 30 days, and a decision reached within three months, promoting adherence to statutory timelines. The writ petition is disposed of with these directions.

Table of Content
1. petitioner filed application; no timely response. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directed action on application; specified timelines. (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

Petitioner claims that she had filed an application in Form 5 under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008 (for short ‘the Rules’), a copy of which is produced as Ext.P4.

2. According to the petitioner, though the application was filed on 05.01.2026 neither has a report been submitted by the Agricultural Officer nor has any decision been taken by the 1st respondent.

3. Form 5 application filed by the petitioner is a statutory application as per Rule 4(d) of the Rules. The competent authorities therefore have a legal duty to consider the said application in accordance with law within a reasonable time. Therefore, there will be a direction to the 4th respondent to submit a report as per the Rules.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to take a decision on Ext.P4 application in a time bound manner.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 4th respondent to submit a report as contemplated under Rule 4(e) of the Rules, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Pursuant to the receipt of the said report, the 1st respondent shall take a decision on Ext.P4 application within three months thereafter. The timeline specified above shall strictly be complied with by the respective officers.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top