IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SAMIR V P – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is the owner of various extent of lands. Petitioner alleges that she had filed an application in Form 6 under Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (for short ‘the Rules’) copy of which is produced as Ext.P2.
2. According to the petitioner, the property is not a paddy land, but it has been wrongly described as paddy land in the revenue records, which requires variation. For changing the nature of land in the revenue records, she filed the application on 21.01.2026. However, it is alleged that a decision has not been taken on the said application till date.
3. Form 6 application filed by the petitioner is a statutory application as per Rule 12(1) of the Rules. The competent authority, therefore, has a legal duty to consider the said application in accordance with law within a reasonable time, provided it has been submitted along with all supporting documents and the prescribed fee.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to take a decision on Ext.P2 application in a time bound manner.
Accordingly, ther
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.