IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MOHANDAS – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER COLLECTORATE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Petitioner claims that he had filed an application in Form 5 under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (for short ‘the Rules’), a copy of which is produced as Ext.P4.
2. According to the petitioner, though the application was filed on 19.01.2026, neither has the report been submitted by the Agricultural Officer nor has any decision been taken by the 1st respondent.
3. Form 5 application filed by the petitioner is a statutory application as per Rule 4(d) of the Rules. The Competent Authorities therefore, have a legal duty to consider the said application in accordance with law within a reasonable time. Hence, there will be a direction to the 4th respondent to submit a report as per the Rules.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to take a decision on Ext.P4 application in a time-bound manner.
5. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 4th respondent to submit a report as contemplated under Rule 4(e) of the Rules, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Pursuant to the receipt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.