IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrkishnan, J
PARIYAT FOUSIA – Appellant
Versus
SREEKANDAPURAM MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion on the parameters of appealability. (Para 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“(i). call for the records connecting Exhibit P26 order dated 7/5/2025 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash Exhibit P26 by issuing a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction;
(ii). issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, directing the 2nd respondent to issue paper form of Trade License to the petitioner in view of pendency of Exhibit P-9 Application, in terms of Section 447 (6) of the Kerala Municipalities Act and renew the same for the subsequent years, within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court ;
(iii). Petitioner also prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense with the English translation of the documents produced in the Vernacular Language. And (iv). Such other reliefs as deem fit and proper by this Hon’ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case.” (SIC)
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P26 order issued by the Secretary to the 1st respondent Municipality. Admittedly, Ext.P26 is an appealable order. In the light of the principle laid down by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.