IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
NITHIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026 Order dated 24.09.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.426/2024 in SC No.1058/2023 on the files of the Special Court under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as ‘SC/ST (PoA) Act, 2018’ for short), Ernakulam, is under challenge in this criminal appeal filed under Section 14A of the SC/ST (PoA)
Act, 2018.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail. Perused the order under challenge. Though notice was served upon the defacto complainant/3rd respondent, as mandated under Section 15A(3) of the SC/ST (PoA) Act, 2018, she did not appear.
3. Here, the prosecution allegation, as could be discerned from the final report, is that the accused, who does not belong to either the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe community, at about 19.30 hours on 06.01.2022, while the de facto complainant, who is a member of the Scheduled Caste community, was travelling in a car bearing registration No. KL-42-H-7997, beat her on the face, outraged her modesty, and also abused her by calling her caste name within public view. Thus, the prosecution alleges commiss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.