IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
S. SUJITH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for registration under labor rules. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding entitlement and records. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observes further opportunity for petitioners. (Para 5) |
| 4. final decision on re-evaluation of registration. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have approached this court being aggrieved by the fact that the application for registration in terms of the provisions contained in Rule 26 A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules , 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the ’Rules') in respect of petitioners 2 to 6, who are stated to be employees of the 1st petitioner, has been rejected by the original authority through Ext.P7 order dated 07-11-2022. It is stated that though the petitioners filed an appeal against Ext.P7 order, the appeal has also been rejected by Ext.P10 order dated 06-11-2024.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the 1st petitioner is the Proprietor of an establishment by name 'Puthenpurayil Traders', which is engaged in the wholesale marketing of note books, periodicals, confectioneries, drinking water, soft drinks etc. According to the petitioners since the nature of business engaged by the 1st petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.