IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PIUS GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA REVENUE DEPARTMENT – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“ I. “Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the Ext.P5 passed by Respondent No.3 rejecting Ext.P3 Application of the Petitioner; II. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding Respondent No.3 to reconsider Ext.P3 application afresh strictly in accordance with law within a time-bound period;
III. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding Respondent No.3 to remove 2.73Ares of property in Re-Survey No.138/3-3 of Kizhakkambalam village, from the data bank;
IV. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that the property of the petitioner is not a paddyland or wetland under the provisions of Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act , 2008;
V. Dispense with the filing of the translation of the vernacular documents;
VI. Issue such other orders or directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, including awarding of cost of these proceedings ”[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 3rd respondent rejecting the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.