Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
RASNA K V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction under article 227 is invoked to challenge decisions of administrative tribunals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. tribunal orders regarding reporting of vacancies before ranked list expiration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments presented about unreported vacancies affecting appointments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. the court's supervisory powers and limits in responding to tribunal findings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. the final decision on the original petition based on established legal principles. (Para 24) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The applicants in O.A.No.795 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ for short) filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging Ext.P8 order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. Going by the averments in the original application, the petitioners are aspirants for appointment to the post of Lower Primary School Teachers (Malayalam Medium) in the schools under the 1st respondent in Kannur District. Based on the test and interview conducted by the Kerala Public S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
