SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 8907

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
RASNA K V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
OP(KAT) NO. 492 OF 2025 | OA NO. 795 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MOLTY MAJEED, SHRI.C.A.MAJEED, SHRI.K.H.ASIF, SHRI.P.B.UNNIKRISHNAN NAIR, SMT.SHERIN BIJU
For the Respondents: SMT.PRINCY XAVIER, SHRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SR.G.P, S.

The supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot alter findings of lower tribunals without clear manifest errors, particularly regarding vacancy reporting tied to expired lists.

Headnote:(A) Article 227 of the Constitution of India - Power of superintendence over courts and tribunals - The court exercised its supervisory jurisdiction but found no illegality in the Tribunal's order regarding vacancy reporting rules and the expiration of the ranked list. (Paras 18-24)

(B) Employment and Education Law - The court upheld the necessity for adherence to procedural rules regarding the vacancies, affirming that the appointing authority must operate within statutory frameworks. (Paras 24)

(C) Jurisdictional Limits - The court clarified that it does not rehear cases in an appeal capacity, reinforcing the supervisory nature of its discretionary power. (Paras 13, 17)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, aspirants for the post of Lower Primary School Teachers, challenged the Tribunal’s order that denied directions for filling vacancies due to the expired ranked list.

Findings of Court:
The court found the Tribunal’s decision to be both legally sound and procedurally proper regarding the alleged vacancies and the responsibilities of the appointing authority.

Issues: The conflict between existing vacancies and statutory reporting requirements to the Public Service Commission was central.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that without appropriately reported vacancies during the list's validity, the appointing authority's actions were aligned with the established legal framework.

Result: The original petition stands dismissed.

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction under article 227 is invoked to challenge decisions of administrative tribunals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. tribunal orders regarding reporting of vacancies before ranked list expiration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments presented about unreported vacancies affecting appointments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. the court's supervisory powers and limits in responding to tribunal findings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. the final decision on the original petition based on established legal principles. (Para 24)

JUDGMENT

Muralee Krishna, J.

The applicants in O.A.No.795 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ for short) filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging Ext.P8 order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.

2. Going by the averments in the original application, the petitioners are aspirants for appointment to the post of Lower Primary School Teachers (Malayalam Medium) in the schools under the 1st respondent in Kannur District. Based on the test and interview conducted by the Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC’ for short), they are all included in the ranked list prepared district-wise for appointment to Lower Primary Schools under the 3rd respondent. Despite having advised several candidates from the ranked list, it is noticed that a large number of substantive vacancies that have arisen during the period of validity of the ranked list are unfilled, on the reasoning that these vacancies will arise only after the present list has expired. Similarly, even though various posts have actually become vacant due to superannuation of the incumbents, the respondents are taking the stand that such vacancies are not available to be filled from the existing ranked list, since the same can be filled as per Rule 7A(2) of Chapter XIV A of the Kerala Education rules 1959 (‘ KER ’ for short), only after the re-opening of schools. Contending that the aforesaid actions are unjustifiable, the petitioners-applicants filed O.A.No.795 of 2025 under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeking the following reliefs:

“i. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other such appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the 3rd respondent to immediately report to the 4th respondent for advise and appointment all the vacancies in the post of Lower Primary School Teacher (Malayalam Medium) in Kannur district, which have arisen or are due to arise during the pendency of Annexure-A2 rank list, from the qualified candidates included in that rank list, at any rate prior to 31.05.2025;

ii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other such appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 4th respondent to immediately advise the suitable qualified candidates from Annexure A2 rank list to the 32 vacancies reported by the 3rd respondent to be presently available in the post of Lower Primary School Teacher (Malayalam Medium) in Kannur District, in accordance with law;

iii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other such appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the 3rd respondent to report the anticipated 20 vacancies due to arise on 31.05.2025 on retirement on superannuation of incumbents to the 4th respondent as vacancies arising during the validity of Annexure-A2 list, and consequently, direct the 4th respondent to advise suitable candidates from Annexure-A2 list to these vacancies”.

3. On 19.05.2025 when the original application came up for consideration along with connected original applications, the Tribunal passed Ext.P2 interim order whereby the Deputy Director of Education in all the districts concerned were directed to report all the vacancies of L.P. School Teachers (Malayalam Medium), arising before the expiry of the ranked lists which were brought into force with effect from 31.05.2022, well in advance befor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top