Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
RASNA K V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction under article 227 is invoked to challenge decisions of administrative tribunals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. tribunal orders regarding reporting of vacancies before ranked list expiration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments presented about unreported vacancies affecting appointments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. the court's supervisory powers and limits in responding to tribunal findings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. the final decision on the original petition based on established legal principles. (Para 24) |
JUDGMENT
The applicants in O.A.No.795 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ for short) filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging Ext.P8 order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
“i. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other such appropriate writ, order or direction, commanding the 3rd respondent to immediately report to the 4th respondent for advise and appointment all the vacancies in the post of Lower Primary School Teacher (Malayalam Medium) in Kannur district, which
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
