IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
P.P. THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed with specific prayers against a municipal order. (Para 1) |
| 2. court emphasizes need for alternative remedies. (Para 2) |
| 3. petitioner permitted to appeal with delay condonation. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"I. to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 3rd respondent and set aside Exhibit P9 order;
II. to issue a writ of prohibition or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 2nd respondent municipality and direct the officials under it to not demolish or take down any portion of the residence of the petitioner’s residence; III. to dispense with the filing of translated transcripts of the documents in Malayalam language produced along with, and marked as Exhibits in, the writ petition; and IV. pass such other writ order or direction that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. The impugned order in this case is an order passed under Section 406 (3) of the Kerala Municipality Act , 1994. Admittedly, it is an appealable order before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions (for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.