Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. SOUMEN SEN, CJ, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
MUBAS M.H. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. issues raised in public interest litigation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. controversy over the nava keralam programme's political nature. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. procedural aspects regarding counter-affidavits. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments against the nava keralam programme. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court's initial evaluation on entering the business of the government. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 6. verification of allegations related to insider information. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. allocation of responsibilities among government departments. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. rules of business regarding budget allocations. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 9. requirement of compliance with financial norms. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 10. concerns over misuse of funds not aligning with project objectives. (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 11. implications of improper budget handling by the government. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 12. legislative requirements for financial actions by the cabinet. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 13. critique of the volunteer selection process. (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 14. final decision on the legality of the nava keralam programme. (Para 53 , 54) |
JUDGMENT
Whether a political party should be the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
