Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
HILDA RODRIGUES – Appellant
Versus
THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of misconduct leading to dismissal (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defense against dismissal and claims of legality (Para 3) |
| 3. exploration of procedural adherence in dismissals (Para 5) |
| 4. mandating exhaustion of appellate remedies (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026 The petitioner, who has been working as Senior Supervisor in the Manjeswaram Primary Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Limited, was proceeded against departmentally for alleged misconduct and was imposed with a punishment of dismissal from service as per Ext.P12 order.
2. The petitioner states that Ext.P12 order is highly illegal and arbitrary. The charges framed against the petitioner are frivolous and unreal. The domestic enquiry was conducted in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The punishment imposed on the petitioner is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offence. The petitioner therefore seeks to set aside the order of dismissal.
3. Standing Counsel appeared on behalf of respondents 2 to 6 and resisted the writ petition. The Standing Counsel denied all the material allegations made by the petitioner in the writ petition. It is sub
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
