Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JAIRAM AYYAPAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's ownership and prior applications are contextually significant. (Para 2) |
| 2. court directed reconsideration based on previous errors and judicial decisions. (Para 4) |
| 3. final orders were to set aside the previous rejection and ensure a review. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order quashing the Ext.P8 letter rejecting Ext.P4 application under Form-A.
ii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents to reconsider Ext.P4 application taking into consideration the operative portion of Ext.P3 K.L.U order permitting the petitioner to use the land for other purposes.
iii. Issue such other writs, directions or orders as are just and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice.
iv. To dispense with the production of translation of documents in vernacular language.
(SIC)
2. Petitioner herein is the absolute owner in possession and enjoyment of an extent of 32.9 Ares of land in Resurvey No.59 (old Sy.No. 4/10) in Block No 63 of Kumaramangalam V
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
