SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ker) 867

T. R. RAVI
Anu Mathew W/o. Late Thomas Mathew – Appellant
Versus
The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Kochi. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rinny Stephen Chamaparampil, Asha Elizabeth Mathew.
For the Respondents: Govt. Pleader Sri. K.M. Faisal.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by non-consideration of Ext.P12 application submitted in Form 6 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008. Petitioner submits that the land is shown as converted land in the Data Bank and in Ext.P7, the Local Level Monitoring Committee has already found that the land is liable to be removed from the Data Bank since it is seen as a dry land. Petitioner has also produced Ext.P15 order issued by this Court, wherein it is held that in cases where the property is shown as converted land in the Data Bank, there is no requirement for an application in Form 5 for the purpose of considering an application in Form 6.

2. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P12 application in the light of the findings in Ext.P7 regarding the nature of the land and without insisting on a Form 5 application, within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The 1st respondent shall also take into consideration the fact that the extent of land is below 25 cents and the schedule as amended applies.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top