Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
CYRIL DOMINIC – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the appeal's context and delay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. argument regarding lack of sufficient explanation for delay. (Para 4) |
| 3. judicial precedent on delay's impact on relief. (Para 5) |
| 4. final dismissal of the writ appeal. (Para 6) |
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present intra-Court Appeal under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act 1958 assails the judgment dated 01.02.2023 passed in W.P.(C) No.2753 of 2022 wherein the writ petition filed by the appellant has been disposed of by the learned Single Judge.
2. Heard C.M. Appln. No.1 of 2025 for condonation of delay.
The appeal has been filed with a delay of 1017 days.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that after passing of the impugned judgment dated 01.02.2023, the certified copy of the judgment was delivered on 03.02.2023. The appeal ought to have been filed on or before 03.03.2023. The reason assigned for the delay is that the appellant was laid up at that time and was undergoing treatment at Urology Department of the Medical College Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram with effect from 22.03.2023 onwards. Thereafter the appellant was discharged from the hospital after having undergone su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
