IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NAZAR – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) Issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records leading to Ext. P5 order and quash the same.
ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 3rd respondent to reconsider the petitioners’ Form 5 application afresh in accordance with law, strictly adverting to the KSREC report (Ext.P6) and the observations in Ext.P4 judgment, within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
iii) direct the respondents to remove the petitioners’ property comprised in Re-Survey No.72/1 (Old Survey No.288/3-2) of Kalady Village, Ponnani Taluk, Malappuram District, having an extent of 6 Ares 8.66 Sqm, from the Data Bank maintained under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 .
iv) To dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents.
v) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. The petitioners filed a Form – 5 application in accordance with the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The same was rejected as per Ex
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.