Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
M/S. ORIZONT TRADING LLP – Appellant
Versus
THE ADMINISTRATION OF UNION TERRITORY OF LAKSHADWEEP(UTLA) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's disqualification due to blacklisting of partner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondents argue reconstitution was avoid disqualification. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court emphasizes authority's discretion in tenders. (Para 8 , 9 , 14 , 15 , 17) |
| 4. counsel debates sufficiency of tender interpretation. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. contentions on judicial review in tender matters. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. interference in tender decisions requires public interest. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. court upholds non-interference in tender evaluation decisions. (Para 22) |
JUDGMENT
2. The facts which led to the filing of the tender notification are as follows: As per Ext.P4 notification dated 7.10.2025, the 3rd respondent invited tenders from the eligible person and entities, for “Transportation and Handling of HSD/Lub Oil filled/empty Barrels and General Cargos at Beypore Sub Division Office, Lakshadweep Electricity Department during the year, 2025-2026”. In response to Ext.P4, the petitioner submitted a tender and Ext.P7 is the “Proforma of Declaration of Blacklisting” furnished by the petitioner stating that, neither the petitioner nor any partner, involved in the management of the said firm, either in his
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
