IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
LEVAGE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to waqf board's decision. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. jurisdiction of waqf matters. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. restrictions on review without statutory basis. (Para 9) |
| 4. dismissal of writ petition based on maintainability. (Para 13) |
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P7 communication dated 03.02.2026 issued by the 2nd respondent Kerala State Waqf Board, through the 3rd respondent Chief Executive Officer, whereby the Waqf Board has reiterated its earlier stand in the decision taken by the Board on 04.02.2025, a copy of which was enclosed along with Ext.P4 communication dated 03.03.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent State Waqf Board, through the 3rd respondent Chief Executive Officer. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to exempt the petitioner from remitting the security deposit in respect of the building constructed in the property of Padiyath Puthenkattil Veeran Haji Waqf-Al-Al-Aulad, which is a waqf registered with the State Waqf Board; and a declaration that the petitioner is not entitled to remit the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.