Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MATHEW JACOB – Appellant
Versus
PUNALUR MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge tribunal's orders. (Para 1) |
| 2. legal framework involving delay and statutory remedies. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's directive on reconsideration based on law. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. final orders directing tribunal to expedite review. (Para 5 , 7) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records leading to the issuance of Exhibit P6 and Exhibit P7 orders passed by the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, Thiruvananthapuram and quash the same.
ii. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, Thiruvananthapuram, to reconsider the appeal filed by the petitioners on merits, after condoning the delay;
iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent not to take any coercive steps pursuant to Exhibit P1 order.
iv. Dispense with the filing of translation of the vernacular documents.
v. Any other further relief or order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper to meet the e
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
