Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. K. BABU, J
SANDHYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of criminal charges against petitioner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's analysis on framing charges and prima facie case. (Para 4 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 28 , 29 , 31) |
| 3. insufficient evidence to support conspiracy charges. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 22 , 24) |
| 4. legal principles regarding discharge and charge framing. (Para 11 , 18 , 30) |
| 5. dismissal of revision petition. (Para 32) |
O R D E R
Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026
The Challenge in this Criminal Revision Petition is to the order dated 01.01.2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Court-I, Thrissur in Crl.M.P.No.5403 of 2025 in S.C.No.725/2011. The petitioner is accused No.11. He faces charges under Sections 120 (b), 143, 147, 148 341, 323, 324, 326, 302 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The prosecution case as narrated in the impugned order is as follows:
“The accused persons formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and committed rioting armed with deadly weapons in prosecution of the common object of the assembly and after a criminal conspiracy hatched, which resulted in voluntarily causing hurt, grievous hurt and death to the respective deceased Maneesh as well as his friend
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
