Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD – Appellant
Versus
HASEENA NAZAR @ HASEENA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of the appeal regarding the regularization of loan account. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. consideration of the learned judge's ruling. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion on the statutory remedies available under sarfaesi act. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. principles established regarding the jurisdiction of the high court and sarfaesi act. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. final decision reversing the lower court's judgment. (Para 14 , 15 , 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The 1st respondent in W.P.(C)No.48653 of 2025 has filed this writ appeal, invoking the provisions under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 , challenging the judgment dated 12.01.2026 of the learned Single Judge in that writ petition, which was one filed by the respondent herein-petitioner, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent Bank to grant her 15 installments to pay the defaulted dues and to pay balance equated monthly installments as and when it falls due, thereby regularising the loan account; and a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P1 possession notice dated 18.12.2025 issued by the 1st respondent Au
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
