Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
SREELATHA S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of the case background regarding the appointment notifications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. evaluation of the learned single judge's decision and the appellant's claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments against the legality and intent of the appeal. (Para 6) |
| 4. determination of adherence to procedural correctness. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J The present intra-court appeal under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 assails the judgment dated 15.01.2026 passed in W.P.(C) No. 38385 of 2025, by which the writ petition filed by the appellant/petitioner was dismissed.
2. The appellant/petitioner had filed the writ petition, seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) To call for the records leading to Ext P11 from the respondents 5 and 6 and issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Ext P11 notification for selection and appointment to the post of Lab Assistant in violation of the provisions of the Co-operative Societies Act and Rules.
(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents 1 to 4 and to desist the Respondents 5 and 6 from conducting selection and app
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
