IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
DASA.P.N – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. Call for records leading to Ext.P5 and issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing Ext.P5.
ii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the 1st respondent to allow Ext.P4 Form 5 application and remove petitioner’s land from the data bank within such time as may be fixed by this Hon’ble Court iii. issue such other orders, writs or directions as are deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court.
iv. award cost of this proceedings to the petitioner.
v. dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents produced as Exhibits in the writ petition."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner submitted Ext.P4 Form – 5 application in accordance with the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The same was rejected, and the petitioner challenged the rejection order before this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.114 of 2024. This Court set aside that order and directed the authorised officer to reconsider the Form – 5 application. Thereafter, Ext.P5 order was passed. Aggrieved by the same, this Writ Petition is filed.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.