IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
T.L.RADHAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's application must reference the original submission date. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. previous judgments guide the application of the law in this context. (Para 3) |
J U D G M E N T
Heard Sri.L.Ram Mohan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Smt.Sylaja S.L., the learned Government Pleader.
2. The petitioner instituted an application under Clause 6 of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, as early as on 12.09.2018. Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in Ext.P4 judgment, the afore application was directed to be treated as one filed under the provisions of Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). On the basis of the directions issued by this Court, originally an order at Ext.P7 was passed, instructing the petitioner to file an appropriate application under of the Act. The petitioner thereafter filed Form-7 application. The application presented is not seen disposed of. By the order at Ext.P13 dated 14.02.2023, the petitioner was directed to satisfy an amount of Rs.12,57,300/- as a condition for allowing the application under of the Act. The contention of the petitioner is t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.