IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V.MENON, A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Shaji N.T. S/o Koyakkutty – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the property acquisition and use. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. past legality and judicial interpretation on land usage. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. re-assessment feasibility under current legal frameworks. (Para 7 , 14) |
| 4. legal requirements under section 27a of the paddy land act. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final ruling and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT :
The respondent purchased a residential property in 2005, situated in Eloor Village, Paravur Taluk, having an extent of 2.43 Ares. The building in the property had been constructed in 1999 by the respondent’s predecessor-in-title. The Panchayat assigned a building number, and the Tahsildar assessed and collected building tax.
3. The respondent approached the Revenue authorities seeking re-assessment of the land as ‘purayidom’ under the Kerala Land Tax Act , 1961 (hereinafter “the Act, 1961”). Such re-assessment would have been straightforward but for the legal bar created by Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act , 2008 (hereinafter “the Paddy Land Act”), which came into force on 30.12.2017.
5. The learned Single Judge, relying on the decision of this Court in Global Education
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.