IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUHAMMAD ALI – Appellant
Versus
PATHANAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6731 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grievance regarding unauthorized construction ignored. (Para 2) |
| 2. hearing direction issued for all parties involved. (Para 3) |
| 3. writ petition disposed with compliance directions. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing respondents 1 and 2 to immediately stop all construction activities being carried out by the 3rd respondent without a valid building permit;
2. Direct respondents 1 and 2 to initiate action under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act and Kerala Panchayat Building Rules , including demolition of the unauthorised construction encroaching upon the pathway;
3. To dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents.
4. To issue such other writ, order or direction as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. "
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the alleged unauthorised construction made by the 3rd respondent. The petitioner submitted Ext.P2 before the 2nd respondent. The same is not considered is the grievance.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and respondents 1 and 2. The manner in which this writ petition is going to be disposed of, no notice is necessary to the 3rd respondent. If the 3rd respondent is aggrieved by any of the directions issued by this Court, the 3rd respondent is free to review petition before this Court.
4. Since the limited prayer of the petitioner is only for a consideration of representation, I think that prayer can be allowed, on condition that while deciding the matter, notice should be given to the 3rd respondent also.
Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:
(i) The 2nd respondent is directed to consider Ext.P2, after giving sufficient opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment (ii) The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition with Exhibits before the 2nd respondent for compliance.
(iii) I make it clear that, I have not considered the matter on merit, and the 2nd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.