SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13079

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
A V BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6494 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.THEJALAKSHMI R.S., SMT.ARUNDHATHI SURESH BABU
For the Respondents: SMT DEEPA V

Court mandates timely administrative action under specific regulatory framework.

Headnote:The writ petition seeks a mandamus for timely consideration of an application under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The court allowed the petition, directing the seventh respondent to report to the third respondent within a month, and the third respondent to act on that report within four months. Thus, ensuring due process in administrative proceedings.

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed with specific prayers regarding application processing. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court mandates report submission and application consideration timelines. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

“a. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 3rd and 7th respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law on Exhibit P2 application within a reasonable time limit as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to fix in the facts and circumstances of the case; and b. Grant such other and further reliefs as are deemed just and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case including the costs of this proceedings, as also the following: “

[sic]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P2 application submitted in Form 5 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

1. The 7th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P2 application to the 3rd respondent/Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 3rd respondent/Authorised Officer is directed to consider Ext. P2 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 7th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the

3rd and 7th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS

Judgment reserved NA
Date of Judgment 20/02/2026
Judgment dictated 20/02/2026
Draft judgment placed 21/02/2026
Final judgment uploaded 24/02/2026
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED

16.06.2025 AND 08.01.2026 IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER’S PROPERTIES ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER, KODUMB VILLAGE Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top