SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13080

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ALEX M.T. – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER MUVATTUPUZHA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6523 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SHIBU JOSEPH, SHRI.SARATH VISWANATHAN, SHRI.AMAN MANZOOR, SHRI. SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL, SMT.VRINDA BABU, SHRI.KEVIN JOSE SHIBU, SMT.SAI GAYATHRI, SMT.ANUSREE GIRIJAN, SHRI.JOSEPH FRANCIS
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

The court affirmed the need for timely consideration of applications under relevant land conservation laws.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the application under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The court directs the second and third respondents to submit necessary reports within one month and the first respondent to consider the application within three months.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks mandamus for timely application consideration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directs timeframes for report and application review. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers : “A) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the 1st respondent to consider Exhibit P4 application and dispose of the same at the earliest, within a time frame fix by this Hon’ble Court.

B) Issue such other reliefs as are necessary in the nature of the case and in the ends of justices. “ [sic]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P4 application submitted in Form 7 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

1. The 2nd and 3rd respondents are directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P4 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1st respondent/Authorised Officer is directed to consider Ext. P4 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 2nd nd 3rd respondents, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS

Judgment reserved NA
Date of Judgment 20/02/2026
Judgment dictated 20/02/2026
Draft judgment placed 21/02/2026
Final judgment uploaded 24/02/2026
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF SALE DEED NO.667 OF

1980 OF PUTHENKURISH SUB REGISTRY Exhibit P2 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 18-09-2025 Exhibit P3 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 29-04-2022 IN THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM-5 Exhibit P4 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 27-10-2025 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT Exhibit P4(a) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P4 APPLICATION

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top