IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MOHAMMAD PARAMBADAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
“i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P 3 Form 5 application of the petitioners after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner within a time limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to remove petitioners’ property from data bank.
iii) Declare that the total of 14 Ares 19 Square meters of land lying in Survey No: 200/11-3 of PulikkalVillage in Kondotty Taluk, Malappuram District is not paddy land.
iv) Dispense with the translation of vernacular documents. v) Issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case. “ [sic]
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 application submitted in Form 5 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.
4. Aft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.