IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MATHEW PAILY @ PAILY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“I. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or such other appropriate writ, order or direction, calling for the records and proceedings leading up to the issuance of Exhibits P5 and P6 order and quash the same;
II. To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the 2nd respondent to reconsider Exhibits P3 and P4 applications under Form No. 5 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 after obtaining a satellite report from the 6th respondent in respect of the property covered by Exhibits P3 and P4 applications and in the light of the settled position of law as laid down by various decisions of this Hon'ble Court within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court;
III. To dispense with the filing of the translated version of the vernacular documents; and IV. To issue such other order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case ”[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 2nd respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by him under the Kerala Conservation of P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.