SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13094

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
VINCY MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6648 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.M.MUHAMMED HUSSAIN
For the Respondents: GP SMT DEEPA V

The court mandates timely consideration of applications under conservation rules for effective governance.

Headnote:The petition seeks a mandamus directing the competent officer to consider the Form 6 application as per the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The court allows the petition by directing the 3rd respondent to submit a report on the application within a month and the 1st respondent to decide the application in five months.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. application for mandamus to consider requests under conservation rules. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's directive for expedited processing of applications. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

“ i) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent or competent officer to whom the power of the 1st respondent is delegated to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P3 Form 6 application in accordance with law within the shortest time period as possible.

(ii) To dispense with filing of the translation of Vernacular Documents (iii) Allow the Writ petition with costs.

(iv) Grant such other further reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct in the facts and circumstances of the case. “ [sic]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 application submitted in Form 6 under Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

4. After hearing both sides, I think that prayer can be allowed.

Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

1. The 3rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext. P3 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1st respondent/Authorised Officer is directed to consider Ext. P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of five months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the

1st and 3rd respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS

Judgment reserved NA
Date of Judgment 20/02/2026
Judgment dictated 20/02/2026
Draft judgment placed 23/02/2026
Final judgment uploaded 24/02/2026
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED

03-07-2025 ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08/04/2025 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION NO.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top