Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SANGEETHA R KARNAVAR – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's assessment of land conversion eligibility. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's reasoning on data bank errors. (Para 4) |
| 4. directive for reconsideration based on the precedent. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction to call for the records leading to Ext. P6 & P7 orders and quash the same.
ii. a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to respondents to allow application submitted by the petitioner under Form 6 of the Act, 2008. OR A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to the first & second respondents to reconsider application submitted by the petitioner under Form No.6 of the paddy land and wet land Act, 2008 on the basis of the Data Bank, building permit and report of KSREC and satellite picture of the property and afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a reasonable time.
iii. such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the nature of this case.
iv. a direction to dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular document produced
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
