IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SANGEETHA R KARNAVAR – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction to call for the records leading to Ext. P6 & P7 orders and quash the same.
ii. a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to respondents to allow application submitted by the petitioner under Form 6 of the Act, 2008. OR A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to the first & second respondents to reconsider application submitted by the petitioner under Form No.6 of the paddy land and wet land Act, 2008 on the basis of the Data Bank, building permit and report of KSREC and satellite picture of the property and afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a reasonable time.
iii. such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the nature of this case.
iv. a direction to dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular document produced with this writ petition. (SIC)
2. Petitioner purchased 4.41 Ares of land comprised in Survey No.14/7 in Vadakkangara Village, Perinthalmanna Taluk, for the sole purpose to construct a house is the submission. According to the petitioner, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.