SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13740

KERALA HIGH COURT
, J
Pushpa I. K. v. Union of India


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: Union of India

Table of Content
1. challenge against art age limits involving constitutional validity. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments concerning previous judgments and implications. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's findings and adherence to precedential rulings. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

1. These writ petitions are filed by the petitioners, who are husband and wife or either of them, having crossed the upper age limit of 50 years for women and 55 years for men prescribed under the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 (for short, "the Act"). The Act prohibits the application of the Assisted Reproductive Technology services (ART services) to the persons above the prescribed age limit. Challenging the constitutional validity of S.21(g) of the Act to the extent it prescribes maximum age for men and women to seek ART services from licensed clinics and also seeking a direction to the respondents to take immediate steps to provide ART services to the petitioners, they have approached this Court with the above writ petitions.

2. Since the petitioners in these writ petitions are similarly situated and the issue involved is one and the same, these writ petitions are heard together and being

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top