Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
M/S MALABAR SOCIAL SERVICE AND SANITATION – Appellant
Versus
SOCIO ECONOMIC UNIT FOUNDATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed by msme. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding conciliation and arbitration provisions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. assessment of statutory provisions defining 'buyer' and 'supplier' under msmed act. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. procedures outlined in msmed act regarding dispute resolution process. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. clarification on applicability and interpretation of various court rulings regarding msmed. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. conclusion on the outcomes of the writ appeal. (Para 44) |
JUDGMENT
The 1st respondent in W.P.(C) No.28740 of 2024 filed this writ appeal under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, challenging the judgment dated 14.01.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition.
3. The appellant filed a counter affidavit dated 24.08.2024 in the writ petition denying the pleadings and opposing the reliefs sought for. The appellant produced Exts.R1(a) to R1(f) documents along with that counter affidavit.
5. On 25.08.2025, when the writ appeal came up for admission, this Court admitted the same on file. The learned counsel took notice for the 1st respondent-writ petitioner and the learned S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
