Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14336

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
JAIMOL RENI – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13566 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: TOGY JOHN
For the Respondents: SRI.P.C.CHACKO, SMT. SURYA BINOY, SR. GP.

Writ petition is resolved based on binding precedent established by a previous judgment.

Headnote:The present writ petition is analyzed concerning the judgment of the Division Bench in Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Joy (2026 KLT Online 1066). The court acknowledges that the issue in this case is already covered by the previous decision, thus affirming that the parties shall be bound by it. The Writ petition is consequently disposed of based on the established legal precedent.

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by both sides that the issue raised in this writ petition is covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Joy (2026 KLT Online 1066) . The parties will be bound by the judgment referred to above.

The Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14336

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JJAIMOL RENI – AppellantVersusTHE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – RespondentWP(C) NO. 13566 OF 2023

Writ petition is resolved based on binding precedent established by a previous judgment.

Cases Referred (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
JAIMOL RENI – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13566 OF 2023