Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14338

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
JAIMOL RENI – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13974 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: TOGY JOHN
For the Respondents: SRI.P.C.CHACKO, SMT. SURYA BINOY

Parties in a writ petition are bound by the precedent established by prior judgments.

Headnote:This writ petition relates to the issue covered by a previous judgment, which stipulates that parties are bound by the prior decision. The court references the case Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Joy for precedent. The petition is thus disposed of in accordance with this binding judgment.

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by both sides that the issue raised in this writ petition is covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Joy ( 2026 KLT Online 1066 ). The parties will be bound by the judgment referred to above.

The Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14338

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JJAIMOL RENI – AppellantVersusTHE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – RespondentWP(C) NO. 13974 OF 2023

Parties in a writ petition are bound by the precedent established by prior judgments.

Cases Referred (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
JAIMOL RENI – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13974 OF 2023