IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction to call for the records leading to Ext.P5 order and quash the same.
ii. a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to first respondent to allow the application under Form No. 5 of the Act, 2008 as evidenced by Ext.P5 order or allow Ext.P3 application submitted by the petitioner.
iii. a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to the first respondent to reconsider application submitted under Form 5 of the Act, 2008 on the basis of the KSREC report, site inspection and afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a reasonable time.
iv. such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the nature of this case.
v. a direction to dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular document produced with this writ petition. (SIC)
2. Petitioner purchased a property from one Binu C.P.
The petitioner’s predecessor filed a Form-5 application under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 and the same was rejected as per Ext.P5. After purchasing the property, the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.