JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

“i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order calling for the records leading to Ext.P-9 and quashing the same.

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order declaring that the property of the petitioner should be excluded from the Data Bank for the reason that there is no paddy cultivation or it comes within the definition of Wetland under the Act.

iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order declaring that the land use pattern has been drastically changed by Highway or residential buildings and there is no evidence of any cultivation of paddy based on Ext.P6 report of KSRSEC.

iv) to dispense with the translation of the documents produced in the vernacular language.

v) and grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case including costs.” (SIC)

2. The petitioner filed a Form-5 application in accordance with the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008. The same was rejected as evident by Ext.P7. The same was challenged befo