Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
ARAVIND S – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations on the identification of posts for reservations. (Para 5 , 8 , 20) |
| 3. legal principles surrounding the power of the high court under article 227. (Para 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. final order affirming the original application. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The 5th respondent in O.A.No.2295 of 2023 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ for short) filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging Ext.P4 order dated 08.04.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. The 1st respondent-applicant is a differently abled person with 80% permanent locomotor disability. As per the pleadings in the original application, he has the qualifications of B.Tech in Electronics and Communication Engineering and M.Tech in Digital Communication. He was appointed as Engineering Assistant (Electronics) in the Public Works Department (‘PWD’ for short) on contract basis as per order dated 03.03.2020 of the 5th respondent Chief Engineer, Administration of PW
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
