SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2331

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
The Kerala Public Service Commission - Appellant 
Versus 
Sheethal C.V., D/o Kumaran - Respondent 
WA No.221 of 2025
Decided on : 23-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : ADV SHRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
For the Respondent: SHRI.S.RAMESH, SHRI.AJAYAN V.N., SMT.NISHA BOSE, SR.GOVT.PLEADER

Reservation under the 2016 Act must be computed against total cadre vacancies; post-identification is for appointments, not for computing the 3%/4% reservation, and backlog vacancies may be utilized with a separate ranked list for differently abled candidates.

Headnote:(A) Law and provisions cited - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - identification of posts (Sec. 32), reservation (Sec. 33), and posts identified for reservation (Sec. 34); Government orders identifying posts for differently abled candidates and related rotational rules; Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 (scope of writ jurisdictions).

(B) Key legal principles - (i) Reservation under Sec. 34 is to be computed against total cadre vacancies and not solely against identified posts; (ii) Appointment of persons with benchmark disabilities requires identification of posts under Sec. 32, but non-identification does not automatically defeat reservation once posts are identified; (iii) backlog or current vacancies arising during the currency of a ranked list may be utilized for differently abled candidates through appropriate special/list adjustments; (iv) identification of posts and reservation must be implemented with promptitude and in accordance with the 2016 Act’s objectives to ensure substantive rights.

(C) Important facts - (i) petitioner, a person with benchmark disability, was included in supplementary communal rank list for the post of Professional Assistant Gr.II (Library) in Kerala Universities; (ii) Ext. P3 notification for recruitment and Ext. P4 ranked list showing petitioner at Rank 11 in the supplementary list; (iii) Ext. P10 (14.02.2024) identifying the post for 4% reservation under Sec. 34; (iv) learned Single Judge’s order directing appointment against one Locomotor Disability vacancy; (v) government/PSC arguments about post-identification timing and backlog vacancies; (vi) final appellate order recognizing 4% reserve vacancies arising during the currency of Ext. P4 and directing preparation of a separate ranked list for differently abled candidates.

(D) Issues - (i) Whether non-identification of posts by the Government can defeat or delay reservation for differently abled candidates; (ii) Whether backlog/current vacancies can be utilized for differently abled candidates notwithstanding earlier identifications; (iii) Whether a separate ranked list for differently abled candidates must be prepared and used to comply with Sec. 34. (E) Findings of Court (ratio decidendi) - (i) Reservation under Sec. 34 is to be computed against total vacancies in the cadre and is not dependent on post-identification for computation; (ii) identification of posts under Sec. 32 is necessary for appointments, but delay in post-identification cannot deny the benefits of Sec. 34; (iii) where posts are subsequently identified for differently abled candidates, vacancies identified for such reservation arise from the cadre and can be filled from the existing ranked list by preparing a separate ranked list for the differently abled; (iv) backlog vacancies may be treated as current vacancies for appointment against the 3%/4% reservations where applicable, subject to statutory mandates; (v) the Government order and circulars that seek to bar or delay reservation post-notification are not legally sustainable in light of the 2016 Act and controlling precedents. (F) Result - The writ appeal is disposed of by setting aside the impugned judgment; the authorities shall consider 4% vacancies for reservation under Sec. 34 in the post identified for differently abled candidates, as arising during the currency of Ext. P4, and shall fill them by differently abled candidates after preparing a separate ranked list, published expeditiously within the specified periods. (Paras 12-16, 40-41; with doctrinal references in Paras 23-25, 29-34).

JUDGMENT :

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC), the 2nd respondent in W.P.(C)No.32605 of 2023, has filed this writ appeal invoking the provisions under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, challenging the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 18.12.2024 in that writ petition. The said writ petition was one filed by the 1st respondent herein-petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent Secretary to Government, Social Justice Department to identify and earmark posts under Section 34 (c) of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, as stipulated under Sections 32 and 33 of the said Act, and the relevant orders in this regard, in Ext.P4 ranked list published by KPSC, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court; a writ of mandamus commanding the 4th respondent Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department to identify and earmark the posts under Sections 33 and 34 of the Act and to report the identified vacancies, with retrospective effect from the date on which Ext.P4 ranked list published by KPSC came into force, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court; and a writ of mandamus commanding KPSC to advice the petitioner for appointment against the first vacancy identified and earmarked for persons with locomotor disability, as stipulated under Section 34 (c) of the Act in the event of respondents 3 and 4 complying with the directions contained in the 1st and 2nd reliefs sought for in the writ petition.

2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, the petitioner, who is a person with benchmark disability, is included in the supplementary list for Ezhava/Thiyya/Billava category for appointment to the post of Professional Assistant Gr.II (Library) in the Universities in Kerala, published by KPSC. The document marked as Ext.P1 is a true copy of the Standing Disability Assessment Board Certificate dated 18.12.2012 issued from the Taluk Head Quarters Hospital, Vatakara, in which the percentage of disability of the petitioner is certified as 40%. Ext.P2 is the Degree Certificate dated 08.06.2022 issued to the petitioner by the University of Calicut, in the faculty of Humanities. Ext.P3 is a copy of the notification dated 16.06.2021 issued by KPSC for appointment to the post of Professional Assistant Gr.II (Library) in various Universities in Kerala. Ext.P4 is a copy of the ranked list published by KPSC pursuant to Ext.P3 notification, in which the petitioner is included in the supplementary list for Ezhava/Thiyya/Billava category, at Rank No.11. According to the petitioner, a separate list for differently abled candidates under 3% reservation is provided under Sections 32, 33 and 34 of the 2016 Act. Ext.P5 is a copy of the appointment chart prepared by KPSC in respect of Ext.P4 ranked list, with the date of advice as 22.07.2023. Ext.P6 is a copy of G.O.(P)No.12/2019/SJD dated 31.10.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent, on behalf of the 2nd respondent State, whereby the turn of persons with benchmark disabilities was revised in the light of enhancing the percentage of reservation from 3% to 4%. Accordingly, the earlier turns of reservation on the 100-point roster at 1, 34 and 67 were revised as 1, 26, 51 and 76. According to the petitioner, she is entitled to be considered under any of the reservation turns for locomotor disability/cerebral palsy under Section 35(c) of the Act, against the already advised 117 candidates for the post of Professional Assistant Gr.II (Library) in the Universities in Kerala.

3. Pursuant to the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16.11.2023, a copy of G.O.(Rt.)No.39/2024/SJD dated 14.02.2024 was placed on record along with a memo dated 27.02.2024 filed by the learned Senior Government Pleader, whereby the 2nd respondent State identified the post of Professional Assistant Gr.II (Library) in the Universities in Kerala for differently abled persons, subject to the conditions stipulated therein.

4. In the writ petition,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top