IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
The Kerala Public Service Commission - Appellant
Versus
Sheethal C.V., D/o Kumaran - Respondent
WA No.221 of 2025
Decided on : 23-07-2025
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC), the 2nd respondent in W.P.(C)No.32605 of 2023, has filed this writ appeal invoking the provisions under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, challenging the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 18.12.2024 in that writ petition. The said writ petition was one filed by the 1st respondent herein-petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent Secretary to Government, Social Justice Department to identify and earmark posts under Section 34 (c) of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, as stipulated under Sections 32 and 33 of the said Act, and the relevant orders in this regard, in Ext.P4 ranked list published by KPSC, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court; a writ of mandamus commanding the 4th respondent Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department to identify and earmark the posts under Sections 33 and 34 of the Act and to report the identified vacancies, with retrospective effect from the date on which Ext.P4 ranked list published by KPSC came into force, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court; and a writ of mandamus commanding KPSC to advice the petitioner for appointment against the first vacancy identified and earmarked for persons with locomotor disability, as stipulated under Section 34 (c) of the Act in the event of respondents 3 and 4 complying with the directions contained in the 1st and 2nd reliefs sought for in the writ petition.
2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, the petitioner, who is a person with benchmark disability, is included in the supplementary list for Ezhava/Thiyya/Billava category for appointment to the post of Professional Assistant Gr.II (Library) in the Universities in Kerala, published by KPSC. The document marked as Ext.P1 is a true copy of the Standing Disability Assessment Board Certificate dated 18.12.2012 issued from the Taluk Head Quarters Hospital, Vatakara, in which the percentage of disability of the petitioner is certified as 40%. Ext.P2 is the Degree Certificate dated 08.06.2022 issued to the petitioner by the University of Calicut, in the faculty of Humanities. Ext.P3 is a copy of the notification dated 16.06.2021 issued by KPSC for appointment to the post of Professional Assistant Gr.II (Library) in various Universities in Kerala. Ext.P4 is a copy of the ranked list published by KPSC pursuant to Ext.P3 notification, in which the petitioner is included in the supplementary list for Ezhava/Thiyya/Billava category, at Rank No.11. According to the petitioner, a separate list for differently abled candidates under 3% reservation is provided under Sections 32, 33 and 34 of the 2016 Act. Ext.P5 is a copy of the appointment chart prepared by KPSC in respect of Ext.P4 ranked list, with the date of advice as 22.07.2023. Ext.P6 is a copy of G.O.(P)No.12/2019/SJD dated 31.10.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent, on behalf of the 2nd respondent State, whereby the turn of persons with benchmark disabilities was revised in the light of enhancing the percentage of reservation from 3% to 4%. Accordingly, the earlier turns of reservation on the 100-point roster at 1, 34 and 67 were revised as 1, 26, 51 and 76. According to the petitioner, she is entitled to be considered under any of the reservation turns for locomotor disability/cerebral palsy under Section 35(c) of the Act, against the already advised 117 candidates for the post of Professional Assistant Gr.II (Library) in the Universities in Kerala.
3. Pursuant to the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16.11.2023, a copy of G.O.(Rt.)No.39/2024/SJD dated 14.02.2024 was placed on record along with a memo dated 27.02.2024 filed by the learned Senior Government Pleader, whereby the 2nd respondent State identified the post of Professional Assistant Gr.II (Library) in the Universities in Kerala for differently abled persons, subject to the conditions stipulated therein.
4. In the writ petition,
Government of India v. Ravi Prakash Gupta
Union of India v. National Federation of the Blind
Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation v. Union of India
E. Dineshan v. State of Kerala
Kerala Public Service Commission v. George Mathew
Reservation under the 2016 Act must be computed against total cadre vacancies; post-identification is for appointments, not for computing the 3%/4% reservation, and backlog vacancies may be utilized ....
Differently abled candidates are entitled to reservation benefits if a post is identified after the initial notification and within the currency of the selection list, adhering to statutory provision....
Mandatory reservation under Section 34 ensures fair recruitment practices for differently abled candidates.
Reservation under the Persons with Disabilities Act is constitutionally mandated and cannot be denied due to post identification lapses; violations warrant legal remedy.
University of Kerala would not be justified in granting approval to the appointments granted by the 5th respondent when those appointments were clearly in violation to the provisions of law.
Only in those cases that the Government is of the view that the posts in the promotional cadres cannot be reserved for the PwD category due to functional or other reasons, the same cannot be used as ....
The judgment affirms the mandatory reservation for persons with disabilities in aided schools, emphasizing compliance with legislative provisions and the management's responsibilities.
Eligibility for appointment in reserved categories depends on the specific nature of disability as defined by law, not merely on the candidate's performance.
The judgment emphasizes the statutory provisions and government orders governing age relaxation, grace marks, and reservation for PwDs, and directs the respondents to work out backlog vacancies and p....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of equal opportunity for public employment and the interpretation of selection rules in the context of ongoing and continuous re....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.