J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are stated to be husband and wife. They possess property extending 48.01 Ares in Sy.No.262/9 of Puthanvelikara village. Though the property referred to above was lying as a dry land, the same was originally included in the draft data bank prepared as 'nilam'. The petitioners made an appropriate application seeking the removal of the property from the data bank. According to the petitioners, by Ext.P1 decision dated 31.05.2013, they were informed that a decision was taken by the Local Level Monitoring Committee (LLMC) to remove the afore property from the data bank. They also obtained a permit for carrying out certain construction in the afore property, and when constructions were being carried out, a stop memo was issued, on account of which the petitioners were before this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.11293 of 2016. This Court disposed of the afore writ petition by Ext.P2 judgment, holding that the respondents are not entitled to interfere with the construction for the reasons stated therein. The State sought to review the aforementioned judgment by filing R.P. No.334 of 2016, essentially contending that there was more than one decisions taken by the