IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for pre-arrest bail under bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. accused alleged of sexual offences. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments discussed for bail application. (Para 4 , 5) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre-
arrest bail.
2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.28/2026 of Kanjar Police Station, Idukki District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 75(1), 351(1), 69 and 71 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000 .
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant had sexual intercourse with the victim four times after giving her a false promise of marriage and thereby committed the offences.
4. I have heard Sri.S.Rajeev, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alle
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.