SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15093

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
VIJEESH – Appellant
Versus
THE VILLAGE OFFICER KUMBALAM VILLAGE – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ, SHRI.IRFAN ZIRAJ, SHRI. VISHNU P.S., SMT.NIMISHA ANTONY, SHRI.MOHAMMED SHEHIN.S.S, SHRI.BIPIN KRISHNAKUMAR, SHRI.ABHIJITH P.A.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the seizure of the motor vehicle under the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 (for short ‘Act’).

2. A Division Bench of this Court in Venugopalan C. v.

Tahsildar (Land Records) [ 2026 (1) KHC 1 ] has found that no seizure can be effected under the afore provisions with respect to a vehicle owned by a third party, used for the activities prohibited under the Act.

In view of the afore, this writ petition would stand allowed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top