Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
ADWAITH – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims prior klu order for land use. (Para 1) |
| 2. court hears arguments from both parties. (Para 2) |
| 3. court identifies non-consideration of klu order. (Para 3) |
| 4. judgment references earlier case to establish precedent. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner contends that his predecessor in interest has obtained orders under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘KLU Order’), with respect to an extent of 4.04 Ares of property in Vellarkad Village of Kunnamkulam Taluk, for using the land for non-agricultural purposes. However, subsequently, the petitioner, upon realising that the properties were included in the data bank, submitted Ext.P5 application on 01.09.2022 in Form 5 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 . By the impugned order at Ext.P7 dated 24.03.2023, the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) having rejected the same, the petitioner is before this Court.
2. I have heard Sri.T.K. Ajithkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Smt.S.L.Sylaja, learned Government Pleader.
3. A reading of Ext.P7 would show that the afore order has been issued solely on the basis of the report of the Agricu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
