IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
NIMSHAD BASHEER M.P – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court addresses the freezing of bank accounts based on suspicion. (Para 1) |
| 2. guidelines for freezing accounts without law enforcement requisitions are established. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court directs bank to inform petitioner about suspicious transactions. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
1. The learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent/Bank, after getting instructions, submitted that the account of the Petitioner mentioned in the Writ Petition is kept as a mule account on account of the suspicion on the part of the Bank with respect to the operation of the account.
2. This Court in Abdul Azeez v. Union of India [2025 KLT OnLine 3447]
considered the question of whether the Bank has the right or authority to freeze the accounts of its account holders on the basis of suspicion with respect to the transactions in the account by itself in the absence of any requisition to do so from a law enforcement agency. This Court held that till the time the RBI comes forward with a Standard Operating Procedure for the Banks to deal with suspicious accounts, the following guidelines are to be followed when the Bank entertains suspicion about the operation of the account:
If the Bank is having reas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.