IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
HARIDASAN K – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of writ petition and prayer for mandamus. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments from both sides regarding legality of seizure. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observation on statutory discretion and conditions for release. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
i) “Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the respondents to release/return the Excavator seized by the 3rd respondent unconditionally to the petitioner, forthwith;
ii) Declare that the seizure of the excavator owned by the petitioner as per Exhibit P2 mahzar by the 2nd respondent is perse illegal;
iii) Dispense with the filing of English translation of Vernacular documents;
iv) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case “ [sic]
2. On 05.02.2026, the excavator owned by the petitioner was hired for the purpose of making platforms for the cultivation of bananas and plantains in the property of Smt. Mani w/o Vijayan is the submission. The 3rd respondent herein came and seized the vehicle stating that the properties are included in the Data Bank and the work done by the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.