Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MARYLIN JOHNSON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation and basis of the writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioners sought to challenge rejection of their application. (Para 2) |
| 3. court addressed procedural adherence in reviewing application rejections. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's directive for reconsideration of application. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
I. “Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to the issuance of Exhibit P4 & Exhibit P6 passed by the 3rd and 2nd Respondent respectively and quash the same as illegal.
II. Declare that the Exhibit P4 & Exhibit P6 are illegal.
III. Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or direction directing the 3rd Respondent to re- consider Form 6 Application No. 67/2023/15132 filed on 18.3.2022 filed by the Petitioners to change the classification of 4.9 ares in Re. Survey. No. 55/8-3 & 55/8-7 of Chowanoor village, Kunnumkulam Taluk, Thrissur District IV. Dispense with producing the English translation of the Exhibits in vernacular language.
V. Grant such other reliefs which this Court deems fit and proper.” [sic]
2. The petitioners' submitted a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
