IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SUDHEER BABU – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitrary denials based on invalid reasons necessitate judicial intervention. (Para 1 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner sought to convert land but faced rejections. (Para 2) |
| 3. court emphasized adherence to legal standards in application reconsideration. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
“(i) To call for the records leading to Ext.P3 and P6 and to quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari.
(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction directing the respondents to grant formal permission for conversion of the subject land of the petitioner under section 27A of the Paddy Land Act (iii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction directing the 2nd respondent to reconsider the Form 6 application submitted by the petitioner and to allow the same.
(iv) To dispense with production of the translation of documents in vernacular language; And (v) Issue any such other writ order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deem fit in the interest of justice. ” [sic]
2. The petitioner submitted a Form-6 application in accordance with Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.