Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
Union Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
M/s. S. S. Glass World – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tenant challenges bank auction of stock in secured asset. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. single judge defers sale to preserve drt subject matter. (Para 6) |
| 3. parties argue tenant status and writ maintainability. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. limited article 227 relief upheld; appeal dismissed. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The 1strespondent in O.P.(DRT) No.30 of 2026 filed this writ appeal underSection 5(i) of theKerala High Court Act, 1958, challenging the judgment dated 19.01.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in that original petition. 2. The 1strespondent herein filed O.P.(DRT)No.30 of 2026 under Article 227 of theConstitution of Indiaseeking the following reliefs:
“i. Call for records leading to Exts.P5 and P6 in S.A.No. 307 of 2025 pending before the Hon’ble Debts Recovery Tribunal-I at Ernakulam, and direct the tribunal to dispose of the same at the earliest.
ii. Stay the operation and implementation of Ext.P7 till disposal of Exts.P5 and P6 by the Hon’ble Debts Recovery Tribunal-I at Ernakulam”.
3. Going by the averments in the original petition, the 1st respondent herein is the applicant in S.A. No. 307 of 2025 pending before the Debts Recovery Tr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
