SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 17724

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
BANK OF BARODA, MARARIKULAM BRANCH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6969 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.BINNY JOSEPH, SMT.JEENU ABRAHAM, SHRI.SURESHKUMAR.C, SMT.MEGHA BIJU
For the Respondents: SRI. K. M. FAISAL

Writ of Mandamus cannot be issued to lift property attachments; proper procedure must be followed as per jurisdictional court precedent.

Headnote:The petition seeks a Writ of Mandamus for removing an attachment on properties in accordance with prior judgments of the Court. The petitioner's request is based on a precedent established in Fathima v. Canara Bank, which clarifies that attachments cannot be lifted under Article 226 directly by this Court but must follow appropriate proceedings. The petition is ruled on the basis of established law.

Table of Content
1. seeking writ of mandamus for property attachment removal. (Para 1)
2. following precedent in lifting attachments is necessary. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2026 The writ petition is filed seeking the following prayers:-

i. To issue a Writ of Mandamus order or direction commanding and compelling the 2" respondent to remove the attachment made subsequent to the creation of Mortgage in the properties having in Re. Sy.Nos.162/17 (Old.Sy.No. 162/11) of Mararikulam North Village, Cherthala Taluk, Alappuzha District having an extent of 02.50 Ares owned by the borrower Mr. Jinakaraj M.P. as evident in Ext.P6 in the Secured Assets;

ii. To issue such other order or direction as this Honorable Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case

2. The relief sought in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in Fathima v. Canara Bank [ 2025 (3) KLT 367 ] which says that this Court cannot efface attachments invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The aggrieved party has to move the Court which has passed the attachment to get it lifted. Hence, the petitioner is permitted to move in accordance with the dictum laid down by this Court in Fathima v.

Canara Bank [ 2025 (3) KLT 367 ]

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top