IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. GOPINATH P., J
M/S. LOGIWARE SYSTEMS & SOLUTIONS – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner engaged in logistics faces obstruction. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's interim order supports petitioner's operations. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. acknowledgement of legal rights affirmed. (Para 3) |
| 4. writ petition concludes with ordered protection. (Para 5) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is a partnership firm stated to be engaged, inter alia, in the business of carrying and forwarding, providing private warehouse facilities to Indian and Multinational companies, and other connected activities. The petitioner is before this court, stating that a warehouse situated within the limits of Okkal Grama Panchayat was taken on lease by the petitioner and that loading and unloading activities at that place are being carried out by headload workers permanently employed by the petitioner and holding valid registration under Rule 26 A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules, 1981 . It is the case of the petitioner that, illegally and without any valid reason, the respondents 3 and 4 created obstructions to the loading and unloading work of the petitioner, stating that they represent the Healdload Workers of the pool in that area and further stating that they are entitled to the work of loadi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.